the girl in the pink suit header image
  Pink Rose Flower

  Fiona Lu's Blog
Sunday, 12 June 2016 @ 19:39  0 dislikes

(Caption: A helpful video 'Idea Framing, Metaphors and Your Brain' starring Lakoff himself, which addresses how frames shape everyday life and our perceptions of it)

Often, humans apply meaning to what is seen, heard, tasted and felt in reality. These ‘sensations’ allow humans to engage with the conscious (tangible) by encouraging a heuristic approach to reality. This can be described as Searle’s concept of neuronal net modeling, where there is meaningful input and meaningful output.[1] 

What I mean by ‘input’ and ‘output’, in the context of human feelings, is for e.g. when a man meets a woman for the first time and they shake hands. Once their hands touch, ‘nodes’ transfer between the man to the woman, and vice versa. The ‘nodes’ take form of a physical and emotional connection, a sort of electrical internal impulse, which causes both to characterise this ‘connection’ as indicative of love or attraction.[2] It can be an intuitive or a rational reaction, depending on how the nodes are transmitted and interpreted. 

Goffman described this idea as “schemata of interpretation”, where individuals “locate, perceive, identify, and label” events and occurrences.[3] Because frames render meaning, it also organises experiences, and guides actions. Once their worlds collide as their hands meet, they immediately infer the ‘Other’ experienced a similar intensity. This impacts on their reality with each other as it is determines their present and future. As a result, the intangible is experienced when it affects emotions and thoughts. Thus, the input concerns the brain, whereas the output involves the body. 

It is interesting to examine conventionalized social behaviour,[4] and how humans behave in such situations. Why are romanticized notions of encountering your potential other half analogous to emotional and physical connection that is, at times, unexplainable? I suppose this comes down to humans rendering an otherwise meaningless aspect of the scene into something that is meaningful.[5]

However, what relevance does this scenario have regarding frames and vectors? Well, a frame refers to the manner in which an event is described or presented to an audience. It extends beyond politics, and communication.[6] In fact, frames provide insight into contexts, and provide assumptions of what is going on, which is susceptible to interpretation.[7] Frames facilitate our interactions with the world, to the extent that it impacts our reasoning, actions and perceptions, and we do not even realise it. Our knowledge of certain professions that are confined to particular buildings and scenarios are born from our acceptance of generalisations associated with those professions society imposed onto us. 

Picture this. If you walked into a room in a dental clinic, you would see a reclining chair, sink, and metal instruments on the table. You would not expect people other than the dentist and his/her assistance in that setting. Other professions sharing that setting would be out of place, and against what we conventionally know. With this example, Lakoff emphasised we rule out certain behaviour, due to its inappropriateness that does not fit with what we conventionally know.[8] This is because frames are inference generating.[9] It inhabits our cognitive unconscious and can influence our decision-making and attitude towards what is seen.[10]

When you think of a hacker, you think of an anonymous criminal who has access to confidential information, and has the capacity to alter, retain and distribute such information. Normally, one would feel threatened by the presence of ‘invisible’ hackers. Although, others may perceive hackers as creators of new conceptions and perceptions, while devaluing and challenging old means of production.[11] Ultimately, the identity of a hacker has transformed from a person who specialises in codes, computers and software, to the everyday man, or the ‘troll’ so to speak. 

In contrast, vectors move information and transport objects and subjects.[12] Vectors are transversal, with the ability to move between and across frames. It is a power that dominates the world.[13] It can either have a negative impact, by disrupting frames, or a positive one, as it enables the proliferation of information, and provides opportunities for the hacker class to change the world.[14] The vectoral class benefit socially and financially from the commodities derived in this disruption.[15] 

For example, the vectoral class are organisations such as iTunes and Soundcloud, which disrupt traditional means of engaging with content. Think of piracy and illegal downloading of music online. The act of downloading illegal content is framed as a crime that affects the music industry and opposes the idea that people are entitled to be rewarded, thus paid, for their work. However, vectoral organisations offer other methods of obtaining content within the boundaries of the law, and in a manner that still satisfies the interests of society. With iTunes, users can download free content (such as podcasts or apps) or pay a sum (for movies and music).

Additionally, framing is a quality of communication that leads others to accept one meaning over another.[16] It is a skill humans develop to understand and respond to the world and what they take to be reality.[17] Frames are a mental structure that deals with language, thought and forethought.[18] To use language, people must have thought and reflected on their own interpretative frameworks and those of others.[19] 

Think of it in the perspective of Gregory Bateson. Frames take the form of metacommunication, and patterns of relations between individual-individual, individual-society, individual-group or individual-media. Both ‘beings’ interact through a spatial and temporal bounding of a set of messages that is sent and received in the space and time of the event.[20] Frames explain what is in a mediated environment, and the social norms that govern our behaviour in that setting. The night before going to church, you would look through your wardrobe and choose an outfit that is sensible. Once you arrive there, you would refrain from using inappropriate language, and avoid causing disruption to the mass or service. You would restrain yourself from acting inappropriately. 

Obviously, the setting you are situated in controls your decisions and reasoning. You would think prior to acting and contemplate the consequences of your actions. Indeed, frames bring meaning into the words we say, and shape our behaviour. Through studying frames and vectors, we come to understand how reality is interpreted when our mentality is shaped by our values, attitudes, societal norms, and beliefs. These frames assist us in applying meaning to events and issues in our world, and empowers us to explore why we react emotionally, physically and mentally. Frames are powerful, not just because it changes the world and the space we are in. It changes us as individuals who have a lot to learn from the world around us.

_______________

[1] Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark (1999) ‘The Efficacious Cognitive Unconscious’ in Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books: p. 115.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Wikipedia 2014, Framing (Social Sciences), Wikipedia, accessed 22 April 2014, <http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framing_(social_sciences)>.

[4] Cognitive Policy Works 2013, Frames and Brains, Rockridge Institute, accessed 22 April 2014, <http://www.cognitivepolicyworks.com/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2009/06/ThinkingPoints_Chapter3.pdf>, p. 1.

[5] Rettie, R 2014, Using Goffman’s Framework to Explain Presence and Reality, Kingston University London, accessed 22 April 2014, <http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/2098/1/Rettie.pdf>, p. 117.

[6] Above n 4, p.1.

[7] Above n 5.

[8] Cognitive Policy Works 2013, Fundamental Values, Rockridge Institute, accessed 22 April 2014, <http://www.cognitivepolicyworks.com/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2009/06/ThinkingPoints_Chapter6.pdf>, p. 2.

[9] Above n 1, p. 117.

[10] Ibid, p. 116.

[11]Wark, McKenzie (2004) ‘Vector’ in A Hacker Manifesto Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: sections, p. 317.

[12] Ibid, p. 313.

[13] Ibid, p. 334.

[14] Ibid, p. 343.

[15] Ibid, p. 312.

[16] University of Twente 2014, Framing, University of Twente, accessed 22 April 2014, <http://www.utwente.nl/cw/theorieenoverzicht/Theory%20clusters/Communication%20Processes/Framing/>.

[17] Williams, Zoe (2014) ‘George Lakoff: “Conservatives don't follow the polls, they want to change them … Liberals do everything wrong”’, The Guardian online, February 1, <http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/feb/01/george-lakoff-interview>.

[18] Above n 16.

[19] Ibid.

[20] Salen, K and Zimmerman, E 2006, A Theory of Play and Fantasy, The MIT Press, accessed 22 April 2014, p. 315-327.